Quantcast Golf Equipment Reviews
Tees2Greens Home Page
in

Golf Equipment Reviews

Golf equipment reviews my Tees2Greens.com members and staff.
  • Callaway RAZR Udesign

    RAZR Fit udesign

    Callaways new online customisation system, udesign™, enables you to design your own unique version of their new RAZR Fit Driver

    Callaway Golf Company (NYSE: ELY) today introduced its new udesign™ by Callaway personalization and customization platform. udesign by Callaway, an online interactive customization tool, gives golfers purchasing a RAZR Fit® Driver the unprecedented ability to design their own version of the Company's hot new club that is already in the hands of Phil Mickelson, Ernie Els and Alvaro Quiros.

    Featuring an innovative and easy-to-use online interface, golfers can visit www.callawaygolf.com/udesign, to select their color choice on RAZR Fit's clubhead and grip, as well as a myriad of shaft model and other custom configurations. udesign by Callaway presents the opportunity to design one of more than 70,000 unique versions of the award-winning RAZR Fit Driver, giving golfers the ability to express their individualism on the course like never before.

    "Golf is already the most personalized sport there is in terms of custom equipment options, and our new udesign by Callaway platform brings personalization to a new and exciting place," said Jeff Colton, SVP Global Brand and Product, Callaway Golf. "The opportunity to design your very own driver in the colors of your favorite team, alma mater or whatever you happen to feel looks best has never been offered on a mass scale. Our research and instincts show that this level of personalization and customization is what golfers want, and we're excited to be the first Brand in golf to offer it."

    Accessible to virtually customize RAZR Fit drivers for both Men and Ladies models, the udesign by Callaway process begins with the selection of a right-handed or left-handed clubhead and a range of loft and color choices. With each selection, the RAZR Fit image on screen modifies to embody the latest design choice. After making a color selection, advanced customization options detailing the choice of stock or after-market shaft, its length, grip model and wraps follow. When finished, each user can view multiple angles of their configuration and also send their unique RAZR Fit design to friends and contacts via Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest or Email through a dedicated share function.

    Recently introduced to Callaway's staff professionals and brand ambassadors, the udesign by Callaway platform has sent a charge of excitement through a team that was already thrilled with RAZR Fit's performance and look. San Diego native Phil Mickelson chose powder blue and gold in honor of the Chargers. Callaway Staff Professional Alvaro Quiros, now famous for using a RAZR Fit to drive a ball 300+ yards over Las Vegas' iconic Bellagio Fountain, got his first look at udesign by Callaway's options this past week in Augusta. "Give me one in every color and I will match my driver with my apparel," said Quiros, who in addition to being the longest hitter, is also a particularly fashion-forward player on Callaway's staff.

    Introduced in December and already a winner on the PGA and European Tours, the RAZR Fit Driver was named Editor's Choice by Golf Digest's annual "Hot List" equipment review. By combining the performance benefits gained from several proprietary technologies with an easy-to-understand adjustability system, Callaway is empowering players around the world to dial in their game with RAZR Fit.

    Callaway's RAZR Fit Driver has a new production introduction retail price of $399 and the udesign by Callaway personalization and customization features an additional fee of $50. Certain after-market shaft and grip choices may entail additional costs. The ability to make designs and place orders is immediately available; the first RAZR Fit Drivers personalized with udesign by Callaway will begin shipping in early May 2012.

    For more on Callaway Golf Company, please visit www.CallawayGolf.com




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • The Golf Sunglasses That Actually Help You “Be The Ball”

    Since David Duvall exploded on the PGA Tour scene in the early 90’s, myself and every other golfer in the world has been wearing sunglasses on the golf course.

    Even the guys who never wore sunglasses in the past are now opting to dawn shades to not only protect their eyes, but look cool doing it.

    In my experiences with shades on the course I had never found a brand that could give me lasting clarity, a good fit and of course, looking cool! They were either too big, scratched too easy or they just didn’t suit the needs at different times of the day. It has been a nightmare to say the least, until now.

    Playing golf the other day with a buddy I noticed he was wearing some new shades, the brand “BE THE BALL”. Now at first I thought he was just gesturing to me to back off and play my game, but he was serious, the company name was BE THE BALL – Sport Optics. I was sold simply on the company name, a line from my favorite golf movie Caddyshack, but now I needed to check these out.

    As I held the glasses I was surprised how light yet incredibly tough they felt and believe me, I gave them a couple of tough twists and pulls just to see (my buddy didn’t like that).

    They slide on your face with ease and feel great! A great wrap feel, total eye coverage and again, lightweight is key! I don’t want to notice glasses as I play!

    The lenses were out of this world, really! Here are some of the features I looked up on their site.

    • 100% optic clarity (De-centered lens)
    • HD (High Definition) Lens Technology
    • Lenses provide complete UVA & UVB protection
    • Frames are made from Grilamid TR-90 & designed using an 8 to 10 Base Curve
    • "Formed Fit" for comfort
    • Temples & Nosepieces are made from a hypo-allergenic material and coated with an Anti-Bacterial agent for heavy perspiration environments
    • BTB Sport Optics exceed ANSI, OSHA & Military Impact Specifications
    • BTB Sport Optics Lenses are "Ballistic" rated

    OK, OK, I know what’s going on here…just as every other pair of glasses I try that are decent, the better they are the more they cost. So scanning the list of features in these shades I was sure good looking and feature packed was going to be out of my price range. That’s just when my golf buddy said, that’s why he had two pairs, the cost!

    These glasses start under 40 bucks and for that you certainly get the best pair of sunglasses at the best price point on the market! As soon I heard the price that went along with the laundry list of awesomeness, I was sold! 

    Go ahead check it out for yourself

    http://www.btbsunglasses.com/golf-sunglasses-s/117.htm

    Oh and when you shoot your best round and look good doing it, you will know what it finally means to “Be the Ball”

    T2G Pro




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Getting older, have to adjust...

    We are all getting older, an indisputable fact. Past a certain age, we lose flexibility, our joints ache and all sorts of other ailments we would rather not have happen. So how does that effect our golf swing? How does playing a round of golf effect our bodies?

    An old friend called wanting my advice on getting back into the game and what clubs/shafts he should use. He is in his sixties. He had stopped playing because of a bad rotator cuff and a very sore elbow. Bob was a 4 handicap so he knows his game. He started playing again and noticed a distinct drop in swing speed and subsequently, a loss in distance. But what worried him the most was the impact on his body.

    So we set about finding the right clubs for him. Thanks to NIKE, we started with a set of VR Pro Cavity Irons in steel, regular flex and went on from there until we found the best setup for him. Here are Bob's comments about this fitting exercise.

    NIKE Shaft FittingThe Nike Pro Cavity with R-Flex steel that you originally sent me, are very nice clubs. I was able to play them without a lot of swing changes. They didn't load and release completely so consequently I had a very straight ball flight much as I had with my original clubs, but with a higher flight and a little more distance (maybe about 5%). Contact on fat shots was just as shocking to the elbow and shoulder as my old clubs, which made the move to graphite seem more like the thing to do.

    You had me go to Carlsbad Golf Center to get fitted with the NIKE's. Because I hadn't played a much recently, a lot of the session was spent trying to fix my swing rather than getting a sense of what shafts were better suited for me. But the fitter helped a lot and we ended up selecting the correct length, lie angle and flex of shaft that I needed to gain back some distance. Accuracy was never a big issue as I hit balls fairly straight regardless of shaft flex.

    We settled on the NIKE Project X 5.5 flex, standard length and they are the bomb. I haven't hit high tight draws since I was playing twice a week and my handicap was a 4. I've not been able to figure out how to cut the ball as yet, but I feel like I'm on the right path and only a few driving range sessions away from figuring it out. Half and 3/4 shots are still a little problematic with the longer irons, but I need to be able to get to a range to figure that out.

    I love the feedback of the graphite when I do hit shots a little on the fat side. I don't get the jarring sensation that I did with the steel shafts. Having a bad left rotator cuff makes these clubs more bearable. These new shafts load and release at just the right time. My old clubs are just too stiff for me to be able to load and release, now that my swing speed has slowed down considerably.

    Distance control - With my old clubs in my heyday, my distances were pretty accurate with each club, but in the past several years, it seemed that all my clubs went the same distance no matter what I did. I could have a 140 yards and it seemed that I could hit a 7,6 and 5 iron and they would all end up fairly close to each other. With the newer R-flex steel, those ranges closed to a 8,7 or 6. With the graphite those ranges closed to 8 or 7. I am also able to hit the 4 iron accurately both off the tee and in the fairway, which I never did with my old clubs. Shorter clubs AW-PW-9 seem to get the correct yardages, but as I've said before, the half and 3/4 shots are not consistent as yet.

    Accuracy - I've always hit my irons fairly straight no matter what shaft I was using. This has not changed between the old clubs and the new (steel and graphite). What I do see with the Nike Pro Cavity R-Flex Steel and Project X Graphite shafts is that I get a much higher ball flight and more spin than with my old clubs. Balls check up on greens rather than rolling out.

    I am a happy golfer again. Still not playing as much as I would like but the new clubs are making the rounds much more enjoyable and my body thanks me for the graphite shafts.


    Bob

    So as your body slows down, drop the ego down a notch and choose the correct clubs and shafts, you will be happy you did...

    Article from Rankmark


    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Rankmark's 2011 Fairway Wood Test

    Rankmark Seal of Approval The 2011 fairway wood test was a little light - the new PING G20 and TaylorMade woods did not arrive in time. I managed to borrow a couple TaylorMade but the PING clubs were too new. In addition, Nicklaus and Bridgestone are building new clubs. But the clubs we tested proved interesting, there were some surprises, some good and some not so good.
    Ashdon BlackSilver Fairway Woods

    Ashdon BlackSilver

    The Ashdon BlackSilver placed well with both average and high handicap groups. Heard most often was how smooth it was how this this club felt, very smooth with less impact on your hands and arms. It's strongest results in both classes was for distance with feel not too far behind.


    Callaway Octane Fairway Woods

    Callaway Octane

    One of the most talked about clubs in our tests, the Callaway Diablo Octane placed well in all classes. It's strongest rankings came were for feel. The high handicap players also like the extra distance they got from this club.


    Callaway Razr Fairway Woods

    Callaway Razr

    The Callaway Razr was not place as well as it's sibling in all but the high handicap group. Distance, looks and feel made it place well with these golfers. The low handicappers liked the sound and feel of the club and it tied with the Octane in this class. The average handicap group had trouble with the feel and consistency.


    Cleveland Launcher FL Fairway Woods

    Cleveland Launcher FL

    Although it did not reflect it in the rankings, the Cleveland Launcher was easily the club that testers felt was the longest. Low handicap golfers could not believe how much distance they got with this club. Overall, the scores in each of the ratings were pretty even for all handicap classes.


    Cobra S3 Fairway Woods

    Cobra S3

    The average and high handicap golfers liked the Cobra S3, it tied for first in both classes. They felt it's strongest attributes were distance and feel. The low handicap group struggled with consistency but liked the feel of the S3.

    Higher handicap testers found the S3 Max more to their liking. They felt it was easier to get ball up and was more consistent.


    Mizuno JPX-800 Fairway Woods

    Mizuno JPX-800

    Though primarily know for their irons, Mizuno hit on the right combination with the JPX-800 for testers in the scratch and low handicap classes who were continually impressed with this club. The results in all ratings were within a point of each other making the JPX-800 a very well rounded club. The average and high handicap classes like the looks but struggled with other aspects of the club.


    Nike Machspeed Fairway Woods

    Nike Machspeed

    The Nike SQ Machspeed did not fair too well with our testers. The low scores for looks were the strongest contributer to the overall low rating.


    Nike Pro VR Fairway Woods

    Nike Pro VR

    The Nike VR Pro finished strong in all classes with the exception of the high handicaps golfers. The scratch, low and average testers liked the feel and consistency of this club with only a slight dip in the other ratings.


    RC JP104 Fairway Woods

    RC JP104

    The RC JP104 results were pretty even across all ratings for the low handicap group. The only dip was in the feel category. Average handicap golfers gave it lower marks for feel and consistency but liked the looks.


    RC JP104 Tour Fairway Woods

    RC JP104 Tour

    As would be expected, the RC JP104 Tour did not do as well the RC JP104 placing only in the low handicap group. Testers really liked the sound with looks and feel next in the ratings.


    Srixon Z-Star Fairway Woods

    Srixon Z-Star

    Interestingly, the Srixon Z-Star placed 4th in all handicap groups but scratch but for different reasons. The low handicap testers liked consistency and distance whereas average golfers liked the looks and sound.


    TaylorMade Burner SuperFast TP Fairway Woods

    TaylorMade Burner SuperFast TP

    As could be expected, the TaylorMade Burner SuperFast TP did well with the low handicap players. It received it's highest rankings for feel and distance.


    TaylorMade R11 Fairway Woods

    TaylorMade R11

    The TaylorMade R11 landed on top of the scratch golfers but much lower for the rest of the handicap levels. It's highest marks came for consistency and distance. The fact that we only had a regular shaft played a factor in the results.


    Titleist 910F Fairway Woods

    Titleist 910F

    Perennially one of the favorites for the low handicap golfers, the Titleist 910F placed on top of the low and average handicap testers. Placing in 3rd for the high handicappers really emphasizes what we have found in this years tests - Titleist clubs are no longer just for the low handicap golfers.





    Add to Technorati Favorites
    Posted Sep 11 2011, 09:15 by rankmark with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Rankmark 2011 Iron Test

    Rankmark Seal of Approval This was a tough test. Ambitiously, we decided to test more models, we had 91 different 6 irons and due to weather (seriously hot), holidays, and just plain bad luck, we had to run eight test events. But we did it and here are the results.

    We learned a lot from these tests, the first being that most people want to hit drivers, not irons.
    Ashdon Loft Line Irons

    Ashdon Loft Line

    The Ashon irons suffered from lack of exposure but most testers were very pleasantly surprised. Our test clubs were all graphite shafts. The club felt good and accuracy and sound were the strongest factors for the clubs.


    Callaway Diablo Edge Irons

    Callaway Diablo Edge

    This club overall was a good club to use for most golfers that tested the club. Highest marks were for looks; sound, feel and distance number were within one point of each other.

    Generally they liked the feel and look. Overall the distance was considered average. This club overall was a good club to use for most high handicap golfers that tested the club.


    Callaway Razr X Irons

    Callaway Razr X

    The Razr X scored strongest in looks and distance. In our obversations, it seemed that testers distances increased the more they hit the club. All totals were within four points of each other.

    The clubs was favored by average and high handicaps, the average score for each group was identical.


    Callaway Razr X Forged Irons

    Callaway Razr X Forged

    The Razr X Forged rated well with the scratch and low handicap testers. Average to high handicap golfers had trouble controlling the club. The only real dip in the ratings came from sound and only one tester gave it low marks across the board.


    Callaway Razr X Tour Irons

    Callaway Razr X Tour

    The Razr X Tour came in with lower marks that the Razr X Forged in all classes but fairly better in the scratch group - this is a players club. It received the best makes for consistency and distance.


    Cleveland CG1 Tour Irons

    Cleveland CG1 Tour

    The low handicap golfers liked this club. Strongest marks were for looks and the lowest was for accuracy, but not by much. The club being a blade with a smaller head had a direct influence on this with the consistent ball strikers giving the CG1 better marks for accuracy. The scratch players felt it lacked a little in distance.


    Cleveland CG16 Irons

    Cleveland CG16

    The testers of this club basically agreed that this club was forgiving and easy to use. The low and average handicap group totals were all within a point of each other which makes this a very consistent club across a large group of golfers.


    Cleveland HB3 Irons

    Cleveland HB3

    Golfers tended to either really like or dislike the looks of the Cleveland HB3 but from our observations and test ratings, this club helped the average to high handicap players hit the ball longer, straighter and get a higher ball flight. The club received very high marks for distance, consistency, feel and lowest marks for looks which greatly effected its finishing position.


    Cobra S3 Irons

    Cobra S3

    Overall, the Cobra S3's highest marks came in the looks category with feel, distance and consistency a close second making the S3 a good club to try. The club's rankings was hurt by low marks for sound.


    Cobra S3 MAX Irons

    Cobra S3 MAX

    The Cobra S3 MAX highest marks came from consistency and distance with feel one point off. The higher handicap testers seemed to prefer the looks of the S3 MAX over the S3.


    Cobra S3 PRO Irons

    Cobra S3 PRO

    Golfers in all groups except scratch struggled with the Cobra S3 PRO. The highest and most consistent marks coming from the distance rating, so control this club and you will see more distance. From our testing, this is a club that is definitely best for the lower handicap golfer.


    Fourteen TC 710 Irons

    Fourteen TC 710

    The Fourteen TC 710, though suffering from lack of exposure, elicited very good comments from our testers. The feel ranking received perfect marks from all. Consistency and distance ran a close second. This is a solid contender.


    Miznuo JPX800 Irons

    Miznuo JPX800

    Throughout the average and high handicap groups, the Miznuo JPX800 did well. All ranking were within one point of each other except sound which was a couple points lower. The high handicap golfers found this club helped them hit a more consistent ball.


    Miznuo JPX800 PRO Irons

    Miznuo JPX800 PRO

    The Miznuo JPX800 PRO worked the best for the average handicap golfers in our tests. Consistent scores across the board in this group accounted for it's final ranking.


    Miznuo MP53 Irons

    Miznuo MP53

    The Miznuo MP53 strong category overall was sound, when they hit the sweet spot, they knew it. Looks and distance were the next highest categories. Interestingly, 75% of the high handicap testers gave the MP53 very strong marks in all ranking categories. Looks for the average handicap group brought the final placement down.


    Miznuo MP58 Irons

    Miznuo MP58

    Golfers seem to enjoy hitting the Miznuo MP58. The look, feel and distance made this club rank among the best in the average handicap group. Light weight and flexibility with good ball flight where comments made regularly on this club.


    Nicklaus NPS-2 Irons

    Nicklaus NPS-2

    Overall, this club was not a crowd favorite. The look and feel of the club were not impressive from most golfers which tested this club, although it ranked much higher in distance.


    Nicklaus Polarity HP Irons

    Nicklaus Polarity HP

    Nicklaus Polarity HP did much better than it's sibling, the NPS-2. The feel ranking was very strong and sound, consistency distance were almost even. Overall, the club suffered from low marks for looks.


    NIKE VR Pro Cavity Irons

    NIKE VR Pro Cavity

    NIKE VR Pro Cavity strengths came from looks, sound and distance. Totals for the low, average and high handicap groups were within 1.5 points of each other making this a very versatile club.


    NIKE VR Pro Combo Irons

    NIKE VR Pro Combo

    This club was impressive. Low handicap golfers seemed to use this club frequently based upon the blade design and it garnered the most perfect score ratings of all clubs tested. Distance along with accuracy was quite evident when testers used this club.


    PING Anser Irons

    PING Anser

    Placing in both the low and average handicap rankings, the PING Anser scored strongest in feel, consistency and distance. Looks and sound brought the club down in the end results.


    PING G15 Irons

    PING G15

    Always a strong contender, the PING G15 continues the tradition. Finishing on top of the high handicap group, the G15 was high in all ranking categories. It dropped in the average category due to its consistency rating but was one of the highest in distance.


    PING K15 Irons

    PING K15

    The PING K15's overall ratings were very consistent. The highest rating cam from looks - people who use PING's, love the the look. Again, it was the high handicap golfers that benefitted the most from this club.


    PING S56 Irons

    PING S56

    In the average handicap group ratings, the PING S56 was very even across all categories though it was two points higher in feel. The low handicap group was also very evenly scored.


    RC Forged Blade Irons

    RC Forged Blade

    This club provided rave reviews on the look and feel of the club. Most testers enjoyed hitting this club, but being a blade, it's lowest rating cam from distance and consistency. Think about this club if you are a consistent striker.


    RC Tour VS Irons

    RC Tour VS

    The RC Tour VS ranked well in all ratings for scratch golfers but suffered some low scores with the higher handicap groups. The club was one of those love it or not clubs because the rating were either very good or very low it all but the scratch class.


    Srixon Z-TX Irons

    Srixon Z-TX

    The reviews on this club were good, overall the results were within two points of each other. Testers liked the accuracy and control of the club but the club suffered from lower rankings in the looks category. Most enjoyed how the club was more forgiving then others.


    TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Irons

    TaylorMade Burner 2.0

    It was interesting that the TaylorMade Burner 2.0 did not finish higher, it had the second highest count of perfect scores. The conclusion being that you either really liked the club or were less than impressed. The average and high handicap results were within a point of each other. Both group found the looks and distance were the clubs strongest assets.


    Titleist AP1 Irons

    Titleist AP1

    The Titleist AP1 averaged out pretty even in all ratings though looks and distance were a little higher. Testers found this club easier to hit than previous Titleist clubs.


    Titleist AP2 Irons

    Titleist AP2

    The Titleist AP2 seemed to be very mixed to an extreme, testers either loved it (most prevalent) or could not make it work for them. The comments were very good regarding this club based upon the sound, distance and control of the club and it did the best in the average handicap group by a fairly wide margin.


    Titleist CB Irons

    Titleist CB

    The Titleist CB was one of the big surprises of this iron test because the club placed so well in all classes but one. It received the most perfect scores and was either first or second in scratch, low and average groups. No other club was as consistent over this large of a group which is interesting in that consistency was the lowest of the categories for this club in all but the scratch group.


    TourEdge Bazooka HT Max Irons

    TourEdge Bazooka HT Max

    Though it helped the average and higher handicaps, the Bazooka HT Max was hurt by it's looks. But true to game improvement clubs, it scored much better in consistency and distance.


    TourEdge Exotics XCG 4 Irons

    TourEdge Exotics XCG 4

    Most testers enjoyed the TourEdge Exotics XCG 4, commenting on its feel, distance and accuracy. Lower handicap players did not care for the look but liked the feel, sound and distance of the club. Average handicaps gave it the strongest rating for feel and accuracy.


    TourEdge JMax Gold Irons

    TourEdge JMax Gold

    There were Mixed reviews on the TourEdge JMax Gold. Hybrids seem to struggle because of their looks. While some stated the distance and ball flight was impressive, others did not like the look and feel. But the average handicap group gave it the best marks with only a one point difference between all ranking criteria.





    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Fitting a Titleist Driver

    A successful fitting will not take place without an experienced fitter. By experience, I not only mean a knowledge of the equipment, but an understanding of the customer. It is up to the fitter to convince the customer to be themselves and not be distracted by the potential of the final results. It is much like a personality test, where many people wish they were someone else rather than finding out who they are. I was impressed with Joe Colbert of JBM Golf and the way he handles the customer while fitting the Titleist driver.

    Secondly, where technology has taken the equipment is incredible. I have a reasonable understanding of clubhead characteristics combined with shaft function. To be able to dial in adjustments on the new Titleist drivers based on instant computerized data with regard to ball flight, spin rate and launch angles is phenomenal. These tests are not new as a whole, but the adjustability of the Titleist club head, along with the ability to change shafts on the spot is one of the recent developments.

    Most impressive for me technically, considering that I am 62 years old, and have been playing golf over 50 years, was the ability to adjust the lie of the driver (this used to be next to impossible). We had found a shaft and loft combination that had good feel but produced a little too much draw. Joe opened the face about 1 degree and flattened the lie close to the same. Right a way the flight was higher and straighter. This was with the 9.5 degree D2 and a 73 gram Diamana stiff flex shaft. We then went to a 10.5 degree D3 head with an aldila 60 gram RIP stiff shaft with the same head characteristics. This was close to the same result, but with a few more yards carry due to the combination of the clubhead settings and the shaft characteristics. More loft, more distance.

    The bottom line is that I was impressed and thoroughly enjoyed my experience. I would recommend Joe Colbert and the Titleist Driver Fitting System to anyone looking for the magic driver. You still have to establish sound technique, but by getting properly fit with a driver, you will certainly improve your driving.

    Jim Barber, PGA

    For more articles on driver fittings, visit rankmark.com




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Tee Test and Reviews

    Tees, who thinks about tees? They are just the pieces of wood that keep the ball off the ground. My guess is that not a lot of thought goes into tees for most golfers, that most of you grab a handful at the Pro Shop before playing a round. I have even seen golfers search tee boxes for non-broken tees or use a broken tee for fairway woods. Probably most of us have. But how about adding a few yards on the cheap?

    So okay, we had a driver test, and I'm thinking this would be a good time to test tees. I gathered up ten or so tees to test and had 20 or 30 golfers try them (additional staff comments were included). The differences, by in large, were small, but each had its own strong points. Check out what we found; read more about it in the product test section of the site - you just might find a tee that will get you a few yards, clean your grooves, work well with shaky hands and do your thing for the environment. All these tees are USGA approved.

    View Tee Test Results


    Add to Technorati Favorites
    Posted Apr 13 2011, 10:17 by rankmark with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Rankmark's 2011 Driver Test

    Rankmark Seal of Approval A good turnout of over 150 golfers over four days of testing gave us a great sampling of handicaps, ages and swing styles. In the years we have been testing golf clubs, we have never had so many ties.

    This year's drivers have a lot new technologies that include increased adjustably, more aerodynamic designs, new colors, different weight drivers, new materials, and new contenders into the market. I'm sure this contributed to of the many ties in each group.

    For more information, news and views on this test, click here...

    Titleist 910D3 Driver

    Titleist 910D3

    Titleist makes clubs that are for low handicap players and the D3 is no exception. The D3 has extensive adjustability but all the test clubs were set as neutral as possible.

    Scratch Finishing first in this class showed the continuing feeling that Titleist is a club for players with low handicaps.

    Low Handicap Just missing the top spot, the Titleist D3 was virtually equal in rating with the D2 and placed second overall. The difference being looks.

    Average Handicap The D3 had high marks for every category except for consistency which is why the D2 rated higher.



    TaylorMade R11 TP Driver

    TaylorMade R11 TP

    A scratch players club with the ability to seriously adjust the club to fit the specific needs of the player. We did notice the club preformed well for a lot of testers even with the adjustments set to neutral.



    TaylorMade Burner Superfast TP Driver

    TaylorMade Burner Superfast TP

    In an interesting outcome, the TaylorMade Burner TP also received high marks similar to the R11 TP and they both tied for first place. Several of the testers said they would take the Burner over the R11.



    Titleist 910D2 Driver

    Titleist 910D2

    A players club, the Titleist D2 differs from the D3 in that it has a 460cc, pear shaped head. It has the same extensive adjustability as the D3.

    Scratch The larger club face and head shape had this club finishing tied for second in this category, leaving the more standard shaped D3 in first.

    Low Handicap The Titleist D2 finished one tenth lower than the D3 and barely missing out in a tie for first place. In these tests the club's only mark that was not even with the others was looks.

    Average Handicap The D2 was tied for first in this group in accuracy, distance but again suffered from a lower mark in looks.



    Callaway Razr Hawk Driver

    Callaway Razr Hawk

    The Razr Hawk, placed in all categories but strongest in the high handicap group. We noticed a distinct tendency to reduce the difference in off-center hits which would have an influence on the higher handicap golfers.

    Low Handicap For the low handicap golfers, the Razr Hawk's characteristics were evenly divided though all scoring categories.

    Average Handicap The average handicap golfers gave the club higher marks for feel, consistency and distance.

    High Handicap The high handicap group put this club in first place with very high marks for sound and feel. The other categories were almost identical.



    Nike SQ Machspeed Driver

    Nike SQ Machspeed

    Scratch In a surprise outcome, the SQ Machspeed beat out the VR Pro in this class. It's strength was it's accuracy, feel and distance were next.

    High The high handicap class liked pretty much across the board but they especially liked the looks.



    Boccieri Heavy Driver Driver

    Boccieri Heavy Driver

    From the makers of the Heavy Putter, this newcomer to the market, the Heavy Driver made a respectable showing even though most testers had not heard of it. We noticed that the off-center hits were not as dramatic as other clubs.

    Low Handicap These golfers gave the Heavy Driver good marks for feel, distance and consistency. It was one of the higher rated clubs for accuracy.

    High Handicap An interesting note, the club did not place with the average handicap golfer but did in the high handicaps. Tied for third, it received high results for looks while getting lower marks for accuracy and the scores for feel, sound and distance were about the same.



    Cleveland Launcher TL310 Driver

    Cleveland Launcher TL310

    The trio of Cleveland drivers, distinguished by different weights, were strong contenders in this test making the cut in all but one division.

    Scratch The average golfer liked the feel, consistency and distance of the TL310.



    Ping G15 Driver

    Ping G15

    One of the things we have found over the years is the Ping people are Ping people. They are a very loyal to this brand.

    High Handicap The Ping G15 is always a contender in driver testing and it placed high in this test also. The only thing that kept it from the top was looks according to our testers.

    Average Handicap Oddly enough, it was the sound that kept the average handicap testers from ranking this club higher.

    High Handicap The Ping G15 results were, for the most part, even. Feel and accuracy were slightly higher.



    Mizuno JPX 800 Driver

    Mizuno JPX 800

    Low Handicap The Mizuno JPX 800 tied for third place with a strong showing across the board. All the categories were within a tenth of each other.

    High Handicap The Mizuno driver also made the cut with the high handicap golfers. They liked the look and sound of the club but gave it low marks for feel. Consistency and distance were tied in the middle of the driver's results.



    TaylorMade R11 Driver

    TaylorMade R11

    Low Handicap Tied for third place, the R11 made the place with looks, sound and feel. Consistency and distance fell off a little. It's adjustability did not seem to effect the outcome.

    Average Handicap Tied for first with 3 other clubs, this club's results had similar result characteristics as the low handicap group.



    TourEdge Exotics XCG4 Driver

    TourEdge Exotics XCG4

    Average Handicap The club had the distinction of being one of the clubs that surprised the members of this group - they said the club added 10 to 20 yards to their drives. This helped bring the club to the top of the list.



    Srixon Z-STAR Driver

    Srixon Z-STAR

    Low Handicap One of the top clubs for sound, the Srixon ZSTAR, is one of the more interesting of the adjustable clubs. A new fitting program is on its way for smart phones so you can adjust the club for the conditions on the day you are playing.

    Average Handicap Looks, feel and accuracy were the strong points of this club for average handicap golfers. They also liked the sound which was the highest mark for this club.



    Nike VR Pro Driver

    Nike VR Pro

    Low Handicap The Nike VR Pro received high marks in sound and distance but looks and consistency kept the club in fourth place. On the other hand, the Nike Machspeed was considered one of the best looking clubs but did not place.



    Callaway Diablo Octane Driver

    Callaway Diablo Octane

    Average Handicap The Diablo Octane placed first in sound, feel and the golfers felt it is was the longest of the clubs tested by this group. The club's feel was its strongest feature.

    High Handicap The Diablo did well in looks but fell short in consistency, something we did not expect in this class of golfers. The other categories were pretty equal.



    TaylorMade Burner Superfast Driver

    TaylorMade Burner Superfast

    Placing in all categories, the TaylorMade Burner Superfast show it versatility and show this club to be a solid contender.

    Low Handicap The low handicap marks were pretty even, with 4 tenths separating all categories.

    Average Handicap This class of golfers like the look and distance versus the other categories with look being the highest.

    High Handicap Again the look carried the Burner to a higher position. The remaining categories were very close to each other.



    Bobby Jones Workshop Superlite Driver

    Bobby Jones Workshop Superlite

    High Handicap In observing testers using the Jesse Ortiz designed driver, we noticed that the club preformed very well for average and high handicap golfers, often adding significant consistency and distance. The Superlite worked better than the regular edition in making this club work for higher handicaps.



    Nicklaus ML4 Driver

    Nicklaus ML4

    Having hit Nicklaus drivers over the years, we felt this was the best driver they have made to date. A strong showing in the average and high handicap groups seem to support that finding.

    Average Handicap The category results for the ML4 were even with the exception of sound which lower the overall standing in the average handicap grouping.

    High Handicap Again, for the this group was sound but it still placed well due to strong showing for feel and accuracy.



    Bobby Jones Workshop Edition Driver

    Bobby Jones Workshop Edition

    High Handicap In observing testers using the Jesse Ortiz designed driver, we noticed that the club preformed very well for average and high handicap golfers, often adding significant consistency and distance. But look influenced the results greatly, they just did not like the look of the club.






    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • New Product Review - The Starter Coin

    Every week before my golf group tees off we have to determine who is going to hit first or who has the “honor.”

    One of us will usually take out a golf tee and toss it into the air and whoever it points at will be first, toss it once more for second and so on. And most times before we are done completing this act the group behind us is already in vocal giddy up mode, mentioning how nice it would have been to do this faster or before we got to the first tee. Now there is an answer to this problem, “The Starter Coin.”

    For the golfers who want a faster and cooler way of picking the hitting order, “The Starter Coin” has it all for them. Not only does the coin look great, it has four distinct areas on the coin that will determine your group’s hitting order to begin the day or if you want to quickly select a new pecking order during the round, even on the busiest of courses.The coin only weighs 1.5 ounces and is a nice oversize so it will easily be found in any golf bag or pocket.It comes with seven unique, fun and sometimes funny phrases on the magnetized ball mark located in the middle of the coin; I had mine etched with “ That’s how I Roll and The Proof is in the Putting.”

    The “Starter Coin” can be a gentleman’s way to start the gentleman’s game or for the golfer who has to have the latest and greatest to show off his new toy; this coin is for everyone. It’s truly the way of the future as the old tee flip is an archaic method that is in desperate need of replacement and “The Starter Coin” is the solution.

    For pricing and information you can visit www.startercoin.com or on facebook at www.facebook.com/startercoin

    Written by Tees2Greens Editorial Contributor Scott Stubblefield 

     

     

     

     




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Review of the Wilson TRIO Push Cart

    I have been in the market for a push cart for about a year or so.  I normally use a motorized cart, but I have some golf pals that enjoy walking, so I thought it would be good to have one since my shoulder isn't crazy about me carrying my clubs anymore.  After researching different brands and styles, I went with the Wilson TRIO push cart.  I'll be honest, cost was the determining factor in this choice.  Paying over $200 for another brand was not in my budget, so I went with what I thought was best value for the features I was looking for.

    The TRIO is relatively light and easy to assemble.  At just under 9 lbs, you can lift it without too much effort while folded, and fully set up it's a breeze to push around.  In the inital set up you need to attach the 3 wheels and secure the handle on the base...none of that requires any extra tools.  Once set up, it's a 3 step process to go from folded to ready to push.  First, unfold the wheel bar, then pull the red base bar until it sets up against the wheel bar...attach the silver clasp and secure.  Then adjust the handle and secure it at the base.  Now you are ready to put your clubs on!

    I have a Callaway stand bag and it was easy to secure.  There is a strap at the base and one at the top.  Your bag cradles into two plastic bases and the straps click in place...they are both adjustable.  The handle area has a place for a scorecard (the box calls it "deluxe" but it's really nothing special), a place for a ball, and a beverage holder.  The beverage opening is small but it did fit a 16oz. water bottle.

    As you can see, the base is sort of a rectangle instead of just one long bar.  I'm not sure if that helps offer some stability, but design is just fine with me.  In fact, I have this crazy idea that I could build some kind of box and use it to move things around in my yard!  Heck, maybe you could even convert it into a stroller!

    The tires seem to be some kind of high density foam, so there is no fear of a flat tire!  The seemed to roll well on the grass and gravel cart paths.  I did find myself going through some thicker rough and after I muscled through it, about 50 yards later one of my wheels fell off.  A rock had lodged in the wheel opening and it undid the lever that secures the wheels.  It was an easy fix and I had no other troubles.  Sometimes it seemed like wheels were slanting, but it could have just been my eyes.  For people that like to push their carts ahead, the TRIO seemed to less willing to roll on its own.  I should also note there is a foot brake.

    After finishing the round it was very easy to fold the cart back up. 

    Here you can see it fits very easily into the back of my small SUV.  I read in some other reviews that if you have a regular trunk you may have to take the wheels off in order to fit both clubs and cart.  It is definitely bulkier than the more streamlined and more expensive cart models, but if you are looking for some good value, I'm not sure you can beat the TRIO!

    I paid $99.99 at www.rockbottomgolf.com   I used a free shipping code that saved me $18.  In seaching today I found the same cart for $89 at www.costco.com  (note, you have to be a Costco member to puchase!) - this also included shipping.  Since I'm not a member it wouldn't work for me, so the Rock Bottom price was the second best.  On average these sell for around $118.  If you are a sale shopper like me, I think you'd be hard pressed to find as sturdy of a cart for under $100.

    I am giving the Wilson TRIO push cart an enthusiastic 4.5!  Minor deductions for being slightly bulky and for my tire falling off.  If you're looking for a streamlined storage cart (and have the money to spend), this might not be the one for you, but I can easily put my clubs right on top of it and still have room for shoes, balls and clothes in the back of my car.

    I am looking forward to using my Wilson TRIO on beautiful summer days!

     

     




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Review of the Callaway Hyper X Driver

     Being the golf shopper that I am, I ran across the 2008 Callaway Hyper X Driver on-line for $129.99 with free shipping!  It seemed like a deal too good to pass up, so before I knew it my confirmation email showed up and I was the proud owner of a new driver!  I have had this club for approximately 4 weeks now.

    This Driver was replacing my Callaway Big Bertha from 2006 (which was a 10 degree club).  I decided to buy an 11 degree Hyper X with a regular shaft so it wouldn't be exactly the same as my Big Bertha.  The Hyper X has a Fujikura Fit-On Graphite shaft and a stock Callaway grip which I like.  The head cover is also much easier to get on and off compared to the Big Bertha.

    It is actually very similar to the Big Bertha in the set up, although the clubface seems taller.  There are no specifics such as weight or flex point on the shaft, but the Callaway web site says it was designed for high MOI.

    The first day I hit it I was getting about 15-20 yards more than the BB.  Since then I have been struggling a little bit with a slice, but I'm pretty sure it's my swing and not my club!  When I hit it on the screws it feels like the ball is just jumping off the club face.  At first I worried that I should have stuck with a 10 degree, but I really can't tell the difference.

    There were 3 guys at my local club that had purchased this driver last year and are still playing it.  After sharing with a few others what a deal I found online, at least 3 or 4 more guys bought this driver, too!  Most of them are really liking it, but one of them realized that the stiff shaft wasn't the fit he needed and he ended up buying a Callaway FT-i instead.

    Overall, I would give this driver 5 stars for value (www.rockbottomgolf.com), and 4.5 for feel.

    If you're in the market for a new driver and don't have a really strong swing, this might be the one for you!




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • The uPro Product Review That Almost Didn’t Happen

    uPro golf GPS deviceI know it’s hard for you to believe that I’m not rich and famous, however the UPS man recently reminded me of that fact. It all started when the nice folks at uPro, who make one of the most successful golf GPS devices in the country, asked me to play a round with the uPro and then tell everyone what I thought. So, they packed it up and called the UPS man and said, “take this nifty device to Sam Johnson in Dallas.”

    Failing to understand the magnitude of my celebrity status, the manager of the building that I have officed in for close to five years refused the delivery and sent the UPS guy packing back to California. It took another ten days and my picture I.D. taped to the manager’s door, but I finally received the uPro package.

    Ordinarily, ten days here or there wouldn’t make any difference, but it’s Christmas, and Santa is making his list and checking it twice, and I hope he has time to add the uPro to your Christmas list because that’s how nifty I think it is… really.

    Let me preface everything that follows with a few facts; I have never used a range finder before, however I have asked my playing partner who owns one of those one-eyed binoculars for yardage a few thousand times. I have watched him shooting the flag stick over and over looking for a flat surface that would give an accurate reading. More than once I’ve heard him joke, “It’s either 129-yards or 375-yards.”

    But the uPro is different. Because it is satellite driven GPS technology you don’t have to shoot anything. Heck, you don’t even have to point it at anything, just look at the screen, but I’m getting ahead of myself.

    I am not much of a technology guy, which luckily is not a requirement for using uPro. With the six or seven courses that I frequent already loaded in the uPro, all I had to do was turn the uPro on, select a course, wait about 10 seconds for it to load, then watch in amazement as the uPro offered up a fly-over of the first hole. Then in easy to read letters about a half an inch tall, it displayed the hole-number, par and yardage to the front, center and back of the green. It also pointed out the hazards and the yardage to the front and clearance yardage of each.

    It was totally cool. Here was a device about the size of a small cell phone telling me everything I needed to know and all I had done was turn it on and choose a course.

    After my initial tee shot, I walked to my ball and pulled the uPro out of my pocket once again. I didn’t point it at the green, or push any button, but there it was; my yardage to the front, middle and back of the green in real time. I stepped a yard toward the green and the uPro took a yard off the reading. I stepped a yard back and it instantly recalculated the correct yardage.

    Then, just for grins, I walk to the 150-yard marker and looked down at the uPro and it was reading dead-on at 150-yards. It was amazing.

    As I moved to the second hole the uPro, without prompting, displayed a message asking if I was now playing the second hole, when I answered yes, it immediately took notice and started the video-flyover view before displaying the yardage. Frankly, the flyover is a bit of a pain on a course you have played many times, but I can see the benefit on a course you play infrequently. In any case, it is easy enough to hit the skip button and move the uPro straight to the yardage you need.

    During my first uPro round, I focused on the yardage read-outs and found them to be dead-on, but there are a lot more bells and whistles at your disposal. You can pan and zoom, get the yardage to any point on the course, choose and mark the best lay-up yardage, as well as yardage to and over every hazard.

    My only complaint has to do with the instructions. The basic getting started info is a snap. Basically you turn it on and you’ll be up and running in no time. However, there are areas such as ProMode and others that are not clearly explained, but that’s about the only thing I found that’s wrong.

    I’m a great believer in having the correct yardage. On the other hand I hate waiting on someone in front of me to find a yardage marker. I figure if the whole world had a uPro we could take a good twenty minutes off of every round.

    Okay, I’m gushing a bit, maybe even a lot, but I really liked uPro and I think you will as well. I promise if you ask Santa for a uPro you won’t be disappointed.

    Just in case you were wondering, uPro did not pay for this review nor did they promise to buy advertising on Tees2Greens.com. However, I did receive a free uPro, but I think my review would have been the same otherwise. It’s pretty cool.

    For more information about uPro go to www.uProgps.com.



    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Review of David Leadbetter's Swing Setter Pro

    My overall experience with swing aids has always been that there has never been a true substitute for PGA Professional instruction and time well spent working on aspects of the swing with someone who actually knows what they are doing.

    When most of us invest in a swing aid to help certain parts of our game we usually use the device incorrectly or incorporate these helpful mechanisms into a swing that is incapable of improvement, I know that sounds bad, but it’s true. This is a tough sport and we all have been desperate enough at times to try just about anything to master the great game of golf.

    Over the years David Leadbetter has been one of the leaders in producing swing aids for all types of aliments. From head to toe he has had us covered and we may have seen a few of those adorned by Tin Cup’s Roy McAvoy, which he so proudly named these inventions, “the tools of ignorance”.

    Well we can finally say good bye to that adage with the introduction of the new David Leadbetter Swing Setter Pro!

    The specs:

    Model – David Leadbetter Swing Setter Pro

    Right Handed Iron

    Molded training grip

    Extendable Plane Pointer/Guide

    One Snapping Magnetic Ball on Shaft

    Instructional Manual

    Instructional DVD

    30 Day Money Back Guarantee

    What I liked:

    The overall weight was very surprising. I thought it would have been very heavy with the addition of the club head and magnetic snap ball, but it felt great!
    The training grip was a bit different than what I have felt in molded grips, but I got used to it quickly and now my grip is better than ever.

    The new Swing Setter Pro has an extendable plane guide that was a nice feature and I found myself using it more and more to determine if the club was on plane or not. There are quite a few drills that you can use with this feature.

    Being able to hit balls with the Swing Setter was fantastic. I have never liked a swing aid that I could not use in a real situation like hitting balls on the range…actually seeing your improvement immediately is so important. Unlike clubs that break or heavy clubs, they don’t give you the same type of feel that you would normally have on the course.
     
    Overall Review:

    The David Leadbetter Swing Setter Pro boasts to fix my poor grip, improve my wrist cock, keep me from coming over the top and increase my power with a solid set of my hands and better ball striking. One simple device can do all this? YES IT CAN!

    I am a huge skeptic when it comes to training aids and I think I have been suckered by every offer out there. After seeing the David Leadbetter videos and commercial on Tees2Greens I wanted to give it a try since I hang out on the site regularly and trust the products that they promote!

    When I received my box in the mail I kissed the wife and kids goodbye and headed out to the club.

    As soon as I pulled in I jumped in the back seat, took out the latest Baby Einstein from the DVD player and began to learn.  The video was fun, informative and got me ready to see the improvement first hand. The video is a must, just reading over the instructions I would have had a much tougher time figuring it all out. Now I was ready.

    Once I got out on the range I got the looks. Sure, I know….kind of embarrassing and annoying, but maybe once I showed the guaranteed improvement they would all want to give it a go.

    As I stated earlier, the grip was a bit weird and different from the traditional ones many of us have used, but you get used to it quickly and it is very comfortable.

    Swinging the club is a breeze and as I stated earlier the weight felt fine even with the addition of the magnetic ball.

    The tricky part for me was learning the tempo of setting the club correctly to get that “click” in the right position and not losing any fluid feel to the swing. Almost immediately you can tell you are taking the club back in the proper manner and if you stop half way you can take one hand off, slide out the built in plain pointer and check if you are “on-plane” as they say. That was a cool feature.

    It was working and fast, feeling more coordinated with every swing. Now was the true test to hit some balls with this baby!

    It was a bit difficult at first trying to concentrate on the swing setter, then continuing with the swing through impact and to finish. It was very ugly to say the least, but what change in the golf swing is immediate. Its does take some work, but slowly I began to really see and feel good results. Obviously, it didn’t feel perfect but I began to understand quickly where the faults were and then I could go back and practice the problem areas.

    This is a very nice product from a guy that knows swing aids. David Leadbetter is the leader in this category and he has introduced yet another item that is sure to improve every level of player.

    Oh, and once the shots began to zip off the Swing Setter the goofy looks from the people at the range changed quickly as I had a few asking me what I was swinging.

    Thanks to David Leadbetter and the Swing Setter Pro for helping with my game, its best product I have seen in years!!

     

     




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Reviewing the Ping G2i Craz-E C putter

    After over 10 years a using a Ping Zing 2 putter, a few years back I bought a copy of a two-ball putter for about $25 - I liked it, but I just didn't have good feel with putts over 8'-10'ft.  But when I tried to go back to a blade putter I just couldn't do it!  So last winter I decided to buy a new putter, and honestly the main reason I purchased the Ping G2i Craz-E C putter was because two of the best putters I know at my local course had a Craz-E.  I have been using my Ping G2i Craz-E C putter for about 4 months, and after initially being frustrated with it, I am now putting better and scoring more birdies than I ever have!  There are a lot, and I mean A LOT, of putters out there (over a dozen new Ping styles alone), but I don't think I'll be shopping for a new putter again for awhile!

    The specs:

    Model - Ping G2i C (center shaft)

    Shaft length: 32 inches

    Blue Ping Stock grip

    What I liked:

    When looking down at the putter head I really like the style and set up of the profile - the line is helpful, and it doesn't feel heavy. 

    The grip is soft and feels very comfortable to hold.

     I was a bit nervous buying a 32" putter, but being only 5'6" the length is actually great. (I can't tell you how many people I see that choke way down on their putters - mine sets up so nice for me). 

    For me, the longer profile putter head gives me the mental impression of a flowing putting stroke, and I feel like I am more square on my follow through vs. a blade putter.

    The Center Shaft is SO comfortable for me - I've tried a couple of the different versions of the Craz-E with the end shafts, and I just love the feel and sight lines of the shaft in the middle of the head.

     

    What took me a while to get used to:

    The blue color - I really wanted the black version of the same putter, but couldn't find it (for the price I wanted to pay).

    Shortening my backswing - for some reason when I first started putting with it I just took the putter too far back and then decelled through - but now I'm in a much better groove.

    Trusting the line on the putter - I've never used a putter with a guide line like that and for the first month I had a hard time believing I had lined up the putt right - so I would pull everything left...but now I believe what I see!

     

    I purchased this putter for less than $65 with shipping from Ebay.  It was used, but looked in new condition with a putter cover and a serial number.  I couldn't be more thrilled with the purchase and would give this putter 5 stars!




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Hybrids, Hybrids, Hybrids!

    This test was taken from rankmark's April 2008 newsletter

    We picked out 64 testers, 21 with 0-9 handicap and 43 with 10-30 handicap. All clubs were hit and ranked on distance, accuracy, and the golfer’s opinion and feel for the club. The point allowance was as follows:

    5 points for 1st place
    4 points for 2nd place
    3 points for 3rd place
    2 points for 4th place
    1 point for 5th place


    TEST RESULTS:
    0-9 Handicap
    Callaway FT 52  
    Bobby Jones 48  
    Hippo XXL 28  
    Nickent 4DX 24  
    Ping Rapture 21  
    Yonex Cyber 20  
    Cleveland XLS

    19

     
    Titlest 585H 19  
    Taylor Made Burner Rescue 18  
    Nicklaus Dual Point  18  
    10-30 Handicap
    Callaway X 67  
    Ping Rapture 54  
    Cleveland XLS 49  
    Nickent 4DX 47  
    Taylor Made Burner Rescue 36  
    Mac Gregor NVG

    36

     
    Bobby Jones 30  

    Nicklaus Dual Point 

    23  
    Grip H2O45 24  
    Titlest 585H 20  



    Callaway X Series
    The X Hybrids are stainless steel hybrids that borrow from our X Series drivers and fairway woods. They incorporate a Modified X-Sole design for versatility and superior turf interaction, as well as proven Callaway Golf technologies.

    CALLAWAY X
    Series


    score: 88

    Bobby Jones by Jesse Ortiz
    Using the same technology as the fairway metals, Bobby Jones hybrids are designed to replace the hard-to-hit long irons. Rather than designing hybrids that look like irons, Jesse Ortiz' philosophy takes advantage of the fairway metal's low and deep center of gravity, its wide bodied triangle-of-stability (TOS), and its versatile contoured sole. Instead of using the homogenous shape of most hybrids long, flat leading edge Jesse Ortiz has created a more traditional shape hybrid. It is a throwback to the old Cleek or Mashee. These clubs were designed for maximum performance, with the ability to get the ball out of every type of lie, whether it be a divot of fairway bunker.

    Bobby Jones

    score: 78

    Ping Rapture
    The combination of a 17-4 stainless steel body, tungsten nickel sole plate and 475 super steel face in the Rapture Hybrids raise hybrid performance to new levels of distance, forgiveness and control. The thin, super steel face provides a hot, responsive hitting area and allows PING engineers to re-distribute weight in the form of tungsten nickel on the sole. The heavier sole plate positions the center of gravity low and away from the face for higher launch and low spin—resulting in high, penetrating trajectories for longer, softer landing approach shots.


    Ping Rapture

    score: 74


    Nickent 4DX

    Nickent spent over one year to develop the next generation of state-of-the-art hybrids. Three different multi-material combinations were tried to find the best possible performance. In the end, Nickent developed the first hybrid to utilize a patented brazing technology that fuses a titanium crown with a steel body; all while making the crown the thinnest it has ever been on a golf club head.


    Nickent 4DX


    score: 68

    Cleveland XLS
    The latest edition to the HiBORE family, this new hybrid has taken performance to another level. Like the Halo, its very successful predecessor, this club's most obvious feature is the inverted crown design, which moves weight lower in the head to make the ball easier to get airborne. Where the HiBORE differs from the Halo is in its face profile. Incorporating feedback from Cleveland's staff Tour players, the toe area has become more square in shape, creating a 10% larger face area. The leading edge has also been flattened to further promote a larger hitting area and make the HiBORE hybrid more playable from all types of playing conditions. Its perimeter weighting also expands the sweet spot for ultimate forgiveness.


    Cleveland XLS

    score: 61


    TaylorMade Burner Rescue
    » SuperFast Club Technology allows for an extremely light shaft and grip to promote faster swing speed for added power

    » Large steel clubhead promotes the highest MOI of any fairway wood in golf for tremendous forgiveness for long, straight results

    » Steel Pull-Face construction provides high COR to promote faster ball speed for increased distance


    Taylor Made
    Burner Rescue

    score: 54


    MacGregor MT
    MT Hybrids feature the same technology forward features, construction and sole design as the MT Fairway Woods. The face progression and set-up is similar as well. But the MT hybrids have slightly deeper faces for more confidence at address than with long irons. Rest assured, the Cup Face 360° Technology has been employed to make the entire club face the sweet spot and provide confidence in knowing even off-center or miss won't negatively affect one's game.


    Mac Gregor
    MT

    score: 47


    Hippo XXL
    The hot new XXL irons from Hippo are the easiest hitting and most forgiving irons ever! The XXLs are a hybrid set of irons with the 3 and 4 long irons being replaced with utility rescue-style clubs for greater playability and versatility The short and mid-irons feature an undercut cavity head design for greater forgiveness and consistency. A flow weight system is also utilized that progresses through the set that not only assists to download the center of gravity for a better ball flight and more distance, but also makes for greater precision and control in the short and mid-irons

    Hippo XXL


    score: 43

    Nicklaus Dual Point
    C.G. “Center of Gravity” aligned with optimal face flex point for maximum trampoline effect.
    Visually enhanced top line to aid alignment.
    17-4 PH stainless steel head that features welded soleplate construction and added weight below the CG.
    Multi-layered face – Thinner around the perimeter and thicker in the center, expanding the clubhead’s “high trampoline zone”.
    Progressive offset.
    Rifle® Graphite shafts (also available in light weight Precision® Steel Crank Shaft® with ShockShield™).


    Nicklaus Dual Point

    score: 41


    Titlest 585H
    The 585•H utility metals blend the best playing characteristics of fairway metals and long irons to provide superior playability and control from the tee, fairway and rough.

    Developed with input from touring professionals, the new 585•H offers fairway metal-type launch with a flatter ball flight for iron-like control.


    Titlest 585H

    score: 39


    Grip H2O5
    Over the last few years, a new trend has developed. Golfers have been replacing their harder to hit and inconsistent long irons and short fairway woods with easier to hit "hybrids" or "utility clubs." Developed by studying the golf games of recreational golfers - men and women with handicaps ranging from six to infinity - the G.R.I.P. Hyper Steel Hybrids offer you the distance of a fairway wood and the accuracy of an iron. Our hybrids are technologically advanced, easy to hit, fun to use, and save strokes.


    Grip H2O5

    score: 38


    King Cobra DWS
    We took the #1 selling utility metal* in golf and made it even better. First, we improved the weight distribution by enhancing our proven Dual Weighting System, which increases MOI for even more forgiveness. And then we incorporated Cobra’s fastback crown design, which shifts the CG lower and deeper, for higher launch and greater carry distance. It’s the kind of club that won’t just improve your game – it’ll change it completely.


    King Cobra DWS

    score: 32

    Allowing each manufacturer one entry in each division
    Rank mark’s testing system has a 5% margin of error, so some of these may be ahead of the one in front of them.

    Here are some that were a part of the test and received many votes:
    Adams Tight Lies 16  
    Alpha Version  25  
    Innovex RLS 21  
    Mizuno CLK 24  
    Sonartec H3 23  
    Wilson Fybrid

    20

     


     




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • More Posts Next page »
    Privacy Policy | Legal Statement | Advertise
    © 2006-2009 Tees2Greens, Inc.