Quantcast June 2009 - Posts - Tees2Greens on Golf
Tees2Greens Home Page
in

Navigate This Blog

Have You Seen This?

Have You Seen This?

Subscribe To This Blog

Tees2Greens on Golf

Thought provoking, original, and often brow-raising editorials on golf by members of the Tees2Greens Editorial staff.

June 2009 - Posts

  • David Duval Isn’t Back, and Tiger Isn’t Gone

    David Duval didn’t win the U.S. Open. The fact that he was on the leader board is surprising. That he very well could have won is stunning. Just as surprising, in the press conference after the match he said that he wasn’t surprised that he was in the hunt; he was disappointed that he didn’t win. Okay…

    “I stand before you certainly happy with how I played, but extremely disappointed in the outcome,” said Duval. “I had no question in my mind that I was going to win the golf tournament today.” All this from a man who began the week ranked No. 882 in the world, and had missed the cut in eight of 13 starts in 2009.

    Did I fall in a rabbit hole? Is this 1997? Could anyone possibly have that kind of confidence after not having a top-ten for seven years? Seven years!

    Duval’s fall from grace was epic. After finishing second seven times from 1995 through October of 1997, he won his first tournament, the Michelob Championship, then routinely racked up twelve wins including a British Open. David Duval was on top of the golf world.

    Then the sky started falling one bad swing at a time. After being crowned the number one player in the world a couple of years earlier, he finished 80th on the money list in 2002. The following year he finished 211th and decided it was time for a break. Some of Duval’s misfortunes are understandable, the injuries and a bout with vertigo.  But without question, at some point, it became a lack of confidence that weighed down on him like a sickness. And, for Duval it was like having the flu for seven years.

    In baseball they say a slump starts in your bat and ends up in your head. Golf is no different.  Duval would ride his slump all the way to 882nd in the world at the start of 2009.

    Remember, we’re talking about a guy that buttoned his top button and sold more wrap-around Oakleys in two years than you could shake a stick at. He was an icon. He was the mountain that Tiger needed to climb.

    He was number one in the world, for God’s sake!

    Today, David Duval has unbuttoned his top button and put on a few pounds. He’s still wearing the Oakleys, and for some reason he has the confidence to believe that he can win the U. S. Open and maybe the British Open coming up in July.  

    “It’s what I want [to be in a position to win majors]. It may be arrogance, but it’s where I feel I belong and I was glad to come up here, hit the golf ball and control myself like I’ve been saying I’ve been doing,” Duval said. “I’ve been talking about how I know I’ve been playing a lot better than the results have been showing.”

    Duval’s instructor, Puggy Blackmon, who also coached Duval at Georgia Tech, said, “I’m not taking any credit for this. David has done all the work. I think if anything, I’ve just been trying to remind him of the way he used to talk to me, the way he used to think and that type of thing… This was phenomenal. This is vintage Duval this week.”

    Does all this mean that David Duval is back? Probably not; at least no more than Lucas Glover, Michael Campbell, Steve Jones and Lee Janzen.

    At this point in his career, I suspect that David Duval is like the rest of us, simply trying to make it through the night.  And he doesn’t need Kris Kristofferson to tell him that “Yesterday is dead and gone and tomorrow is out of sight.”

    Duval is a reminder that tomorrow is not promised to anyone, even Tiger Woods, who is likely taking a putting lesson and wondering how in the world he could finish behind David Duval.




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • The Lessons at Bethpage Black

    Someone once said that you should learn something everyday. So what’s the lesson at Bethpage Black and the U. S. Open? Not the obvious one that you and I are not good enough to play in the Open. That’s too easy. I’m looking for something more profound, because as regular readers know, profound is my middle name.

    So what is the lesson; that difficulty is a relative term? I know that. How about that everyone eventually fails, but everyone doesn’t eventually win? Life isn’t fair; there’s a news flash. Perhaps the lesson is in what and why we watch? Is it the artistry or the anguish we crave? Does watching the Open have the same appeal as watching some kind of natural disaster? Are we the guy slowing down the car to see if there is any blood? Do we secretly watch Jerry Springer when we’re alone? Is it the thrill of victory or the agony of defeat? And if the Super Bowl was on the other channel which one would we watch live and which one would we Tivo? 

    The answer is yes, yes, perhaps, not really, sure and who’s playing?

    I forgot the source, but the story goes that a player once asked a U. S. Open official if their goal was to embarrass the best players in the world, to which the official responded “We are not trying to embarrass the best players in the world, we are trying to identify them.”

    That’s profound, but is it true?

    Let me state more of the obvious; I am not a world-class golfer. Nor am I one of the best players in my country, state, city, neighborhood, and maybe not even on my block. I don’t do anything at a world-class level, not even sleep. Call me a wimp, but I don’t seek out the most difficult golf courses to play, not because I don’t think I have a chance, I simply don’t think it’s fun to work that hard at a game.

    Obviously, I don’t make my living playing golf, but watching the U. S. Open, it doesn’t look like the best players in the world are having much fun. Perhaps I don’t understand what greatness is all about. Jimmy Dugan, or was it Tom Hanks that said, “It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard is what makes it great.”  My Daddy said, “If work was fun they’d call it play,” and these guys are working, right? On the other hand, if golf isn’t fun does it cease to be a game? How’s that for profound?

    I guess the lesson is that it is probably a lot more fun to watch the U. S. Open than to play in it. It might also be true that playing 300 rounds of golf a year, including four competitive rounds at Bethpage Black, is likely not even close to being fun. And while we’re baring our souls, being rich and famous may not be all that much fun, either. Just ask Jon and Kate Plus 8.

    But before you think I’ve gone off the deep end, I want you to understand that I really don’t believe that world-class talent, fame and fortune are the root of all evil. As we all know, men wearing thong underwear is the root of all evil.

    Would it be fun to play like Tiger? Sure.  If I could do anything at a world-class level, even for just one day, that would be cool. Would Tiger Me choose to play Bethpage Black on my day off? Probably not, but that’s Tiger Me not Tiger You. Would being rich and famous change me?  God, I hope so.




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • I Can’t Wait For the Return to Bad-Ass Bethpage Black

    Bethpage BlackLike you, I’m watching the St. Jude Classic on the boob-tube, but forgive me because my heart is already moved to Farmingdale, New York and the U. S. Open and Bethpage Black.

    It’s not news that the USGA selects the most challenging golf courses for the U.S. Open, nor is it news that Bethpage Black is harder than Chinese arithmetic.  It is their steely-eyed intention is to make U.S. Open the most rigorous test of golf this side of Mars, and once again Bethpage Black qualifies. According to the USGA, a U.S. Open course should test all forms of shot-making, mental tenacity, and physical endurance under conditions of extreme pressure. And, although some may disagree, the guys in charge actually try to ensure that a well-played shot produces a good result. They have a plan, a detailed plan for conducting the Open, but like every round of golf ever played, that plan is fluid depending on the weather and other stuff. The following factors impact U.S. Open course setup. The mix of these varies from course to course, year to year. The bottom-line is that the evaluation of course setup does not and should not focus on one element but considers the whole enchilada. Here are the factors:

    1. Length, variation and playing characteristics of individual holes;
    2. Length of overall golf course relative to total par;
    3. Teeing ground locations (i.e., angles of play, variation of distance day to day);
    4. Fairway width and contours;
    5. Fairway firmness and speed;
    6. Green speed relative to percentage slopes and contours of the putting greens;
    7. Putting green firmness;
    8. Rough height, density and stages of severity;
    9. Bunker preparation (i.e., create challenge of recovery);
    10. Green surrounds (e.g., closely mown areas vs. primary rough);
    11. Hole locations (relative difficulty, balance in location of left vs. right, front vs. back of green, anticipated wind, anticipated length of approach shot);
    12. Risk and reward options;
    13. Anticipated weather conditions; and
    14. Pace of play.

    In addition, the championship will arrange the U.S. Open primary rough cut at different heights, determined by the hole and its yardage.

    Each hole also will have two distinct cuts in the primary rough. Generally speaking, a ball that barely trickles into the primary rough won’t be as severely punished as one that misses the fairway by 15 yards. There is no target score for a U.S. Open. While the final score at some U.S. Open sites will be at or near par, the USGA does not try to formulate a course setup that will only produce a winning score of at or near even par.

    In case your wife asks, famed architect A.W. Tillinghast created Bethpage Black and Rees Jones was given the responsibility of restoring the course to its former glory prior to the 2002 U.S. Open. Rees is credited for reviving the size and scale of Tillinghast’s original bunkers, which now resemble the old black and white photographs that hang in the clubhouse.

    The Farmingdale, New York course opened in 1936 with a scary slope of 148 and a rating 76.6. At 7,496 yards, A. W. and Rees expect folks to take only 71 strokes to traverse the 18 holes. It is said that the green contouring is ordinary compared to Winged Foot (also designed by Tillinghast), however that doesn’t seem to make Bethpage Black play any easier, does it?

    I don’t know why, but for some reason A. W. didn’t finish the Black course, which may explain why the 18th hole is not the most inspiring finishing hole in golf.  It’s a pity that Tillinghast wasn’t able to add the finishing touches he does so well; nevertheless Bethpage Black is still one of Tillinghast’s and golf’s finest courses.

    Although the famous sign at the first hole that states, “The Black Course is an extremely difficult course which we recommend only for highly skilled golfers,” may be true, I suggest that it be replaced with the following sign: “Golf and sex are the only things you can enjoy without being good at them.” -- Jimmy DeMaret.

    Enjoy the U. S. Open. I know I will.




    Add to Technorati Favorites
  • The Power of Mickelson’s Game

    With the news of Phil Mickelson returning to tournament play this week, I’ve decided to tell you my Mickelson story, and I don’t mean Phil, I mean Amy Mickelson.

    Semi-regular readers of this space figured out a long time ago that I was not a big Phil Mickelson fan. They assumed that I didn’t like his attitude, or that he had snubbed me at some media event, or that I thought he had a million dollar swing and a two-dollar brain, and all that would be true. But frankly, I never thought much about Phil Mickelson one way or another until 1996; that was the year Phil won the Byron Nelson Championship.

    Since the Byron Nelson Championship began in 1956 (then known as the Dallas Open), after accepting the trophy and check, winners have been escorted to the marshals' tent to thank and toast the hundreds of volunteers who worked so hard to help make the tournament a success. It’s a respected tradition carried out over the years by the likes of Don January, Sam Snead, Jack Nicklaus, Chi Chi Rodriguez, Lanny Wadkins, Tom Watson, Raymond Floyd, Ben Crenshaw, Fred Couples, Payne Stewart, Nick Price, Ernie Els, Tiger Woods, Sergio Garcia, Vijay Singh, Adam Scott and others. You get the point.  

    The tradition of the winner visiting the marshals' tent at the Nelson is not some half-baked idea that I thought up. It was and is, in the purest sense, a tradition based on a mutual love for the game and the men and woman who play at its highest level. A Tradition created by none other than Byron Nelson and carried on by the tournament that still bears his name.

    In 1996, Phil Mickelson was 26 years old, a professional golfer and already a millionaire. Since 1992, he had dated a former cheerleader who knew nothing about golf. As a matter of fact when he told her he was a professional golfer, she assumed that he worked at a golf course. She soon learned differently.

    Throughout the 1996 Byron Nelson Championship, Phil’s soon to be wife Amy walked the course in support of her betrothed almost unnoticed. With her wedding to Phil about a month away, she was hoping that Phil would win enough for a nice down payment on the house they wanted to buy, which seems kind of naive in retrospect. History will tell you that her dream came true when Phil won the ’96 Nelson and pocketed enough money to buy several houses, depending on your taste.

    It was a storybook tournament ending; young superstar with beautiful fiancée by his side wins the Nelson and flies off on their honeymoon with Lord Byron Nelson’s words of congratulation still ringing in their ears. It was the golfer equivalent to having your marriage blessed by the Pope.

     However, there was one task left to do before Phil and Amy flew off to Shangri-La; Phil was supposed join Byron Nelson in the marshals' tent for the traditional toast and congratulations to the volunteers. However, young Phil, with the winner’s share already in his back pocket, apparently didn’t see the point and had no intention of wasting ten minutes worth of his time congratulating who? Even after the tradition was explained to him, young Phil was anxious to start his own tradition of getting out of town before the sun went down.

    Then up stepped Amy and promptly informed young Mr. Mickelson that the discussion was over and that he was going to take ten minutes out of his life and thank the volunteers. And with that he and Amy got into the golf cart and headed for the marshals' tent where Phil was totally charming and humble. Amy also thanked the volunteers and told everyone about buying her new home and we all cheered.

    When I heard about Amy Mickelson being diagnosed with breast cancer two weeks ago, I remember the strong young woman who stepped up that day in 1996 and taught Phil Mickelson a thing or two about life. And, I expect, this same young wife and mother is still strong and about to teach the rest of us a thing or two about life.

    I’ve always known that women were nicer and always suspected that they were also the stronger of the species, but now and then even the strongest could use an edge. So take a moment and say a prayer, or light a candle, or simply think good thoughts for Amy Mickelson; she’s the strong one standing behind Phil.




    Add to Technorati Favorites
Privacy Policy | Legal Statement | Advertise
© 2006-2009 Tees2Greens, Inc.